RRVWP

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Remediation might not be necessary

At a time when more high schools are looking to their graduates' college-remediation rates as a clue to how well they prepare students for college and careers, new research findings suggest a significant portion of students who test into remedial classes don't actually need them. Separate studies from Teachers College, Columbia University, and the Harvard Graduate School of Education come to the same conclusion: The way colleges are using standardized placement tests such as the College Board's Accuplacer, ACT's Compass, and others can misidentify students, and secondary schools and universities should work to develop a more comprehensive profile of students' strengths and weaknesses in performing college-level work. (Sarah D. Sparks at Education Week)
Posted by Red River Valley Writing Project at 5:59 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Education Week, Teacher as practitioner

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Programs and Information

  • Summer Workshops
  • School-Year Programs
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Search This Blog

Loading...

About the RRVWP

Red River Valley Writing Project
The Red River Valley Writing Project, a local site of the National Writing Project, brings together teachers in eastern North Dakota and western Minnesota to learn about the teaching of writing.
View my complete profile

Subscribe To RRVWP

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Follow by Email

Links

  • Common Core Resources from NWP
  • National Writing Project
  • Reading Next
  • Success in Postsecondary Writing
  • TED Talks
  • UND Writers Conference
  • Writing Next
  • Writing to Read

We like these blogs...

  • Free Technology for Teachers
    Study Jams - Elementary Math and Science With Music
    10 hours ago
  • Kevin's Meandering Mind
    This Summer, We’re Making Learning Connected
    14 hours ago
  • Larry Ferlazzo's Websites of the Day...
    Interesting Tweets From #CalTURN Conference
    5 hours ago
  • TeacherScribe
    Managers vs. Leaders
    6 hours ago

Blog Archive

Our GoodReads Shelf

RRVWP's books

Teaching Writing as Reflective Practice
5 of 5 stars true
Teaching Writing as Reflective Practice
by George Hillocks
Hillocks, the grand-daddy of research on teaching writing, challenges teachers to think about writing instruction as instruction that includes inquiry about something. In other words, students need to write about something they've invest...
Narrative Writing: Learning a New Model for Teaching
5 of 5 stars true
Narrative Writing: Learning a New Model for Teaching
by George Hillocks Jr.
Hillocks, in perhaps his most accessible work, argues that writing instruction and learning might best begin with narration. Students have stories to tell and, through the telling of those stories, students can learn about the craft of w...
Effective Literacy Instruction: Building Successful Reading and Writing Programs
5 of 5 stars true
Effective Literacy Instruction: Building Successful Reading and Writing Programs
by Judith A. Langer
In this work based on a comprehensive study, Judith Langer explains what effective literacy instruction looks like. Most importantly, she urges teachers to help their students achieve "high literacy," a kind of literacy that includes spe...
Strategic Reading: Guiding Students to Lifelong Literacy, 6-12
5 of 5 stars true
Strategic Reading: Guiding Students to Lifelong Literacy, 6-12
by Tanya N. Baker
Strategic Reading is one of the best books, if not the best book, on reading instruction. The authors deftly explain Vygotskian Learning Theory, instructional scaffolding as well as other important literacy concepts. If you have time to ...
Flow
4 of 5 stars true
Flow
by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Flow gets at what people feel when they are engaged in optimal experiences. Literacy researchers have used the idea of flow to help teachers think about engaging students in the optimal experiences recounted in flow.

goodreads.com
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.



Simple template. Powered by Blogger.